12 Best Client Approval Software for Creative Assets

Client approval software platforms might look similar on the surface, but they're built for very different asset types. While they all handle client approvals, the features you need differ depending on what type of creative work you need approved.

Tools designed for video review will fall short when reviewing static design mockups. And website design tools need entirely different functionality than audio proofing platforms.

Each review process needs distinct capabilities, so this guide breaks down the best tools by category:

• Design Mockups & Static Visuals: For designers and agencies reviewing logos, images, PDFs, illustrations, and print materials
• Website Design: For web designers and developers gathering feedback on live sites, prototypes, and UI/UX work
• Video: For video producers and content creators managing review and approval of video projects
• Audio: For audio producers, podcasters, and sound designers collecting feedback on audio files

Within each category, you'll find the key features to compare so you can pick the right tool for your workflow.

Top Client Approval Tools for Design Mockups & Static Visuals

These tools help you review digital and print files like logos, illustrations, and PDFs. When evaluating these tools, look for features like:

• Pin comments
• Versioning/side-by-side compare
• Drawing tools
• Approvals with due dates

1. Figma

Figma is a browser-based design tool that lets clients leave real-time comments directly on design files. The platform includes built-in version history and sharing options that allow clients to review designs without creating Figma accounts.

It's best for design teams who already create mockups in Figma and want real-time collaboration. However, it doesn't have built-in support for advanced approval workflows. Instead, community widgets are essential for managing reviewer states and tracking whether designs are accepted.

2. Filestage

Filestage is an approval platform that brings together feedback for different content formats including designs, documents, videos, and websites. The platform includes built-in version management, allowing teams and clients to track all file versions and compare them side-by-side.

It's best for agencies and marketing teams managing high volumes of creative assets who need workflow automation and detailed approval tracking. But it lacks flexibility with limited options for setting up customized approvals or dynamic routing.

3. Ziflow

Ziflow is an online proofing platform that manages creative workflows and centralizes feedback for designs, videos, and websites. It provides version tracking with side-by-side comparison capabilities to help stakeholders review the right iteration.

It's best for enterprise creative teams and agencies handling complex approval processes with multiple stakeholders. However, its advanced feedback features and high price tag may be excessive for smaller creative teams.

Top Client Approval Tools for Website Design

These tools help you collect client feedback on live sites and prototypes. When considering these tools, look for features like:

• On-page annotations
• Screenshot capture
• Video feedback
• Project management integrations

4. Feedbucket

Feedbucket was built when I ran a web agency, after I grew tired of chasing down vague client feedback during website launches. The goal? Make it easy for clients to tell you exactly what needs fixing, and just as easy for your team to act on it.

Here's what makes it work: you add one script tag to your staging site, and you're done. No browser extensions for clients to install, no separate accounts to create.

They just visit the site and can immediately submit feedback using annotated screenshots or screen recordings (with optional voice). Everything they need is right there in their browser.

Let's say you're launching an e-commerce site. Your client spots a pricing error on the checkout page. Instead of sending you an email saying "the price looks wrong," they can click directly on the incorrect price, annotate it, and explain what should change. Feedbucket automatically captures the browser type, device specs, console errors, and screen resolution. You're not playing twenty questions over email trying to reproduce a bug.

The client approval process happens directly on the website through an embedded guest portal. Clients can see all open feedback, add comments to existing threads, and attach files without switching between different platforms.

Visual pins show exactly where feedback exists on the site, which cuts down on duplicate submissions. When someone has a question or wants to add context, the conversation stays connected to the specific issue rather than getting lost in email threads.

What really sets Feedbucket apart is the two-way sync with project management tools. Client feedback flows directly into Asana, ClickUp, Jira, or whatever your team already uses as tasks ready to be worked on. That means your developers can handle everything from their PM tool.

On the embedded guest portal, clients and other stakeholders can collaborate directly on the website.

Comments sync back and forth between your PM tool and the client portal on the website. When your team marks a task as done, it automatically resolves in Feedbucket and notifies the client so you don’t have to manage approvals in two places.

Here's a bonus: While we designed Feedbucket primarily for website feedback, it also supports reviewing design mockups and static files.

So before you even start building, you can upload design mockups to Feedbucket and collect client approval on static files. Upload versions for desktop, tablet, and mobile, share a link, and clients can annotate and comment just like they would on the live site. It keeps the approval process organized from the earliest design concepts through final launch.

5. Markup.io

Markup.io is a visual feedback platform that works as a browser proxy, allowing teams to comment on websites, images, PDFs, and videos. The platform creates shareable links where stakeholders can leave feedback without needing accounts or app installations.

This tool is best for teams that need a versatile tool for reviewing multiple asset types beyond just websites. Just keep in mind that it lacks integrations with project management tools like Asana, Jira, and ClickUp. This can create confusion, as teams have to manage review tasks in a separate platform.

6. Pastel

Pastel is a website feedback tool that layers comments directly on live websites using proxy technology. Teams share a canvas link that allows reviewers to leave sticky note-style comments without creating accounts or installing software.

Pastel works well for teams who want a simple tool for non-technical clients. However, its simplicity can also be a drawback. It only has basic sticky-note style comments without drawing tools, arrows, or markup capabilities for more detailed visual feedback.

Top Client Approval Tools for Video

These tools help video producers, creators, and freelancers manage the review process on a single dashboard. When evaluating these tools, look for features like:

• Frame-accurate comments
• Timecode-linked threads
• Review links

7. Frame.io

Frame.io is a video collaboration platform that lets teams upload, review, and approve video projects with frame-accurate, time-stamped comments directly on video frames. The platform integrates with Adobe Premiere Pro and Final Cut Pro, letting editors view and respond to feedback without leaving their editing software.

It's best for video production teams and filmmakers who need deep integration with professional editing software and camera to cloud workflows. However, it lacks native integrations with project management tools like Asana, Jira, and Monday which can slow down busy video and creative agencies.

8. Wipster

Wipster is a video review and approval platform designed for creative teams to share work-in-progress and collect frame-accurate feedback. The platform supports video, images, PDFs, and audio files, with extensions for Premiere Pro and After Effects that allow teams to share work and respond to comments directly from the timeline.

It's best for video production teams who need to review multiple asset types beyond just video. The main drawback is it doesn't let you export comments directly into editing software with markers or timecodes. This can create extra manual work, leading to bottlenecks in editing workflows.

9. Vimeo

Vimeo is a video hosting and collaboration platform that combines high-quality, ad-free playback with review tools for professional creators. Teams can share private review links where stakeholders can leave time-coded comments, mark feedback as resolved, and track changes across video versions.

It's best for creative professionals and businesses needing both hosting and collaboration in a centralized platform with strong privacy controls. The biggest drawback is it lacks dedicated approval workflow features like multi-level approvals, automated status tracking, and final approval sign-off that dedicated review platforms provide.

Top Client Approval Tools for Audio

These audio-focused tools are ideal for agency and freelance teams that work with podcasters and creators. When comparing these tools, look for features like:

• Waveform-level comments
• Timestamped notes
• Multitrack reference support
• Loudness checks

10. Notetracks

Notetracks is an audio collaboration platform where teams can upload audio or video files and leave time-stamped comments directly on the waveform without interrupting playback. The platform includes a freehand drawing tool for visual notes and allows teams to sync audio tracks to video.

It's best for podcasters, music producers, and audio creators who want precise, collaborative feedback directly on their audio projects. While Notetracks exports comments to Audacity and Adobe Audition, integration with other popular DAWs is limited. Instead, it requires a manual process that may not fit into your workflow.

11. Descript

Descript is an AI-powered audio and video editor that transcribes content and allows users to edit media by modifying the text transcript. Teams can collaborate in real time with comments and edits that sync automatically.

It's best for podcasters and content creators who want to edit quickly using AI-powered features. The main thing to consider is it's primarily built as an editing tool rather than a dedicated review platform. This means it lacks specialized approval workflows and status tracking that other audio collaboration tools provide.

12. Bounce Boss

Bounce Boss is an audio file sharing and collaboration platform designed for music producers, engineers, and artists to manage project versions as they evolve. The platform displays integrated loudness and true peak levels alongside each track's waveform, with automatic level matching to compare versions.

Best for music producers and mastering engineers who need loudness analysis and level-matched comparisons during the mixing and mastering process. Its strengths lie in version control, which means it doesn't offer advanced approval workflows, task assignment, or status tracking.

If you're primarily focused on website approvals, try Feedbucket's 14-day free trial. It lets clients submit clear, contextual feedback right on your staging site, and your team can manage everything from your existing project management tool.